<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are SpankingOnline failing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/</link>
	<description>News from the spanking film industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JN4sty</title>
		<link>http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>JN4sty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spanking-news.com/?p=257#comment-456</guid>
		<description>From what I know they are sharks of the highest order, avoid ther sites at all costs and dont give them any income and spred the word, they are thiefs who dont give a shit about others even when they have their stupid annual offers. who would lock in ther customers on those prices unless they are planning something? are they trying to get as much as they can before they disappear? I fully expect the &quot;empire&quot; of sites to offer even more ludicrous watered down crap offering the same tired shit. I cant wait to see there new Xmas Offers end of August. they get earlier and more desperate every year from what i remember they are only 2 brothers and very few hapless people they keep close through debt, mebbe less now after they stiffed everyone last year. I hope they burn. jerks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I know they are sharks of the highest order, avoid ther sites at all costs and dont give them any income and spred the word, they are thiefs who dont give a shit about others even when they have their stupid annual offers. who would lock in ther customers on those prices unless they are planning something? are they trying to get as much as they can before they disappear? I fully expect the &#8220;empire&#8221; of sites to offer even more ludicrous watered down crap offering the same tired shit. I cant wait to see there new Xmas Offers end of August. they get earlier and more desperate every year from what i remember they are only 2 brothers and very few hapless people they keep close through debt, mebbe less now after they stiffed everyone last year. I hope they burn. jerks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanking Fanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanking Fanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spanking-news.com/?p=257#comment-133</guid>
		<description>It does seem strange that a company that professes to be one of the largest spanking film producers have had to resort to tactics more reminiscent of those of Robert Maxwell.

Dino Spadone, the owner of SpankingOnline has professed on another forum that SOL Digital Services did not necessarily own the SpankingOnline site.

This is disingenuous in the least as for years he has used the SOL Digital offices in York to film, produce and edit material for all the sites he now claims SOL did not own! I can only presume therefore that Dino owns the sites personally.

The only conclusion I can make of this is that he set up SOL Digital Services Ltd solely as a shell company so as to give a veneer of legitimacy to their activities and trade off the name and reputation of the sites whilst ensuring that he could dump bad debts (including those legitimately owed to Strictly English) and then continue trading without interruption.

I hope that this thread gets syndicated and picked up by Google so that other innocent film makers who are approached by Dino Spadone will know that any contract they sign with a company he is involved in is not worth the paper it is written on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem strange that a company that professes to be one of the largest spanking film producers have had to resort to tactics more reminiscent of those of Robert Maxwell.</p>
<p>Dino Spadone, the owner of SpankingOnline has professed on another forum that SOL Digital Services did not necessarily own the SpankingOnline site.</p>
<p>This is disingenuous in the least as for years he has used the SOL Digital offices in York to film, produce and edit material for all the sites he now claims SOL did not own! I can only presume therefore that Dino owns the sites personally.</p>
<p>The only conclusion I can make of this is that he set up SOL Digital Services Ltd solely as a shell company so as to give a veneer of legitimacy to their activities and trade off the name and reputation of the sites whilst ensuring that he could dump bad debts (including those legitimately owed to Strictly English) and then continue trading without interruption.</p>
<p>I hope that this thread gets syndicated and picked up by Google so that other innocent film makers who are approached by Dino Spadone will know that any contract they sign with a company he is involved in is not worth the paper it is written on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

