Comments on: Are SpankingOnline failing? http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/ News from the spanking film industry Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:33:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Spanking Fanatic http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/11/are-spankingonline-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Spanking Fanatic Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:43:38 +0000 http://www.spanking-news.com/?p=257#comment-133 It does seem strange that a company that professes to be one of the largest spanking film producers have had to resort to tactics more reminiscent of those of Robert Maxwell. Dino Spadone, the owner of SpankingOnline has professed on another forum that SOL Digital Services did not necessarily own the SpankingOnline site. This is disingenuous in the least as for years he has used the SOL Digital offices in York to film, produce and edit material for all the sites he now claims SOL did not own! I can only presume therefore that Dino owns the sites personally. The only conclusion I can make of this is that he set up SOL Digital Services Ltd solely as a shell company so as to give a veneer of legitimacy to their activities and trade off the name and reputation of the sites whilst ensuring that he could dump bad debts (including those legitimately owed to Strictly English) and then continue trading without interruption. I hope that this thread gets syndicated and picked up by Google so that other innocent film makers who are approached by Dino Spadone will know that any contract they sign with a company he is involved in is not worth the paper it is written on. It does seem strange that a company that professes to be one of the largest spanking film producers have had to resort to tactics more reminiscent of those of Robert Maxwell.

Dino Spadone, the owner of SpankingOnline has professed on another forum that SOL Digital Services did not necessarily own the SpankingOnline site.

This is disingenuous in the least as for years he has used the SOL Digital offices in York to film, produce and edit material for all the sites he now claims SOL did not own! I can only presume therefore that Dino owns the sites personally.

The only conclusion I can make of this is that he set up SOL Digital Services Ltd solely as a shell company so as to give a veneer of legitimacy to their activities and trade off the name and reputation of the sites whilst ensuring that he could dump bad debts (including those legitimately owed to Strictly English) and then continue trading without interruption.

I hope that this thread gets syndicated and picked up by Google so that other innocent film makers who are approached by Dino Spadone will know that any contract they sign with a company he is involved in is not worth the paper it is written on.

]]>