<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAFEE SITEADVISOR A REAL DANGER TO LEGITIMATE WEBMASTERS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/12/mcafee-siteadvisor-danger-to-webmasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/12/mcafee-siteadvisor-danger-to-webmasters/</link>
	<description>News from the spanking film industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spanking Fanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.spanking-news.com/2009/12/mcafee-siteadvisor-danger-to-webmasters/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Spanking Fanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spanking-news.com/?p=263#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Consider that McAfee&#039;s own page which condemns this very site itself has no boxes ticked for any problems at all other than it links to other red-flagged adult sites.

If you then go to the trouble of checking their McAfee alert pages they also show no problems other than links to sex sites.

So, is there also a way that puritanical employees of McAfee are abusing the system by manually declaring adult sites &#039;dangerous&#039; without proof?

Is this why their complaint system is actually useless because it is company policy to act against the legitimate sex industry.

If that is the case then this American company is definitely acting illegally against the First Amendment right to free speech by trying to stifle businesses which are legitimate.

We need to know more about this malicious piece of software and the people who may be using it for their own perverse and illegal ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider that McAfee&#8217;s own page which condemns this very site itself has no boxes ticked for any problems at all other than it links to other red-flagged adult sites.</p>
<p>If you then go to the trouble of checking their McAfee alert pages they also show no problems other than links to sex sites.</p>
<p>So, is there also a way that puritanical employees of McAfee are abusing the system by manually declaring adult sites &#8216;dangerous&#8217; without proof?</p>
<p>Is this why their complaint system is actually useless because it is company policy to act against the legitimate sex industry.</p>
<p>If that is the case then this American company is definitely acting illegally against the First Amendment right to free speech by trying to stifle businesses which are legitimate.</p>
<p>We need to know more about this malicious piece of software and the people who may be using it for their own perverse and illegal ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
