Age verification – more questions than answers – A serious look at whats happening

This excelent article is taken from the blog by feminist pornographer and activist Pandora Blake. She  has been at the fore front of the fight against censorship of allkinds. We recomend her far seeing articles to all who have an interest in the spaking and adult scenes. We support the Open Rights Group and would ask that you take a look at their website and if possibel contribute.

Since the Digital Economy Act passed in April, age verification is coming to the UK – and the government have announced a deadline of April 2018. Thanks to the combined campaigning efforts of myself and various groups, we managed to get an amendment passed which averted the worst case scenario regarding prohibited content. But with web blocking still in place as a potential sanction, and no safeguards for user privacy, the Act still represents bad news for UK internet freedom.

I’m not the only one concerned about this. The Open Rights Group are also worried about the consequences of this badly-worded new law. This month I’ve had meetings with Executive Director Jim Killock and Legal Director Myles Jackman about age verification and what we can do about it. ORG have a long history campaigning for digital rights, and I’ve been a member for over ten years. We’ll working together over the coming months to campaign on age verification and privacy, alongside my work with Backlash and as an independent voice.

I joined ORG in meeting Chris Ratcliff from the Digital Policy Alliance, the cross-party group consulting to the Government on the age verification policy, and also with a representative from the DCMS (the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport – the ‘digital’ has been recently added), the branch of the civil service who are responsible for implementing it. The meetings were useful in allowing me both to make my concerns known, and ask questions to improve my understanding of the situation. Although I learned a lot, overall it seems that as far as age verification is concerned, there are still more questions than answers. 

The process of implementing AV

All websites visible by UK viewers have to have AV installed by April 2018. For a new tech policy to be implemented this is an incredibly short time frame. This problem becomes worse when it’s revealed that none of the details are yet in place that will tell people how AV is going to work, or what they need to do to comply.

The Act being passed is just the first stage; there’s now a schedule of events that need to take place before anyone can comply. Even having talked to the DCMS, made careful notes, and re-read the text of the law just now, I’m still a bit confused about exactly what the process is. But my best current understanding of the schedule is as follows:

This all adds up to a lengthy bureaucratic and Parliamentary process, and frankly I find it doubtful that it will be complete before the end of the year. That doesn’t leave people much time at all to comply with an April 2018 deadline.

The DCMS told me in person that the first step is for them to draw up guidance for the regulator. I can’t find reference to this in the law, unless it’s the guidance mentioned in 14 (2) specifying the “circumstances in which material is or is not to be regarded as made available on a commercial basis”.  As I understand it, the DCMS need to lay out how the regulation is going to work, what the regulator’s powers and responsibilities will be, which sites will fall under the scope of the law, and what process the regulator will have to follow in order to be in line with the law. This needs to be approved by Parliament, which is currently in its summer recess; therefore this step can’t be completed until after Parliament reopens in the Autumn.

It doesn’t make sense for the new age verification regulator to be designated until after the guidance has been approved specifying what their role will be; otherwise the regulator won’t know what they’re signing up for. The British Board of Film Classification have been tipped as the regulator-in-waiting, but they don’t have any authority until they’re officially appointed.

A lot of people have questions about how the regulation is going to be enforced and what they need to do to comply. But until the guidance has been published and the new regulator has been appointed, no-one can answer them. This is pretty inconvenient for people who are keen to crack on with implementing age verification.

These uncertainties around the regulatory guidance and the identity of the regulator are massive obstacles when it comes to figuring out how age verification is going to work in practice. It’s absolutely ludicrous that people are expected to comply with age verification by next April when there are still months of bureaucracy ahead before we know exactly what will be considered compliant. Installing age verification on a website is not an overnight process: many site owners are going to have to overhaul their websites considerably, moving all material classifiable as 18 or above  behind age checks, shopping around for the best and most affordable age verification solutions (which is tricky when very few age verification systems have been launched yet, and most are still in development), and installing the requisite software. All of it is going to take time, effort and money. And yet, we might only find out what’s required a couple of months before the deadline.

Sites which install age verification systems which the regulator doesn’t consider compliant will be penalised just as badly as sites which don’t bother to install AV at all – making it all the more important that this information is published in time.

The notification process, sanctions and penalties

The law has a whole section on financial penalties, and yet I had it from the DCMS in person during our meeting that there are “no plans to give the regulator the power to issue fines”. Seemingly this is because the BBFC don’t have the experience or resources to apply fines, and it doesn’t  look like a second “enforcement regulator” (as was mooted during the Parliamentary debates) is going to be designated. But until the guidance has been published, we can’t know for sure. This is a massive issue for UK site owners, and official, published guidance on exactly what penalties are at stake is needed as soon as possible.

It seems that the notification process will be as follows:

  • The AV regulator identifies a site as falling within their scope, and classifies it to establish that the content on it would be considered 18 or higher.
  • The AV regulator assesses the AV systems in place on the site, if any.
  • If the site has insufficient AV in place, or if the AV used is not considered compliant by the regulator, or the regulator notifies the site owner and gives them a deadline to comply.
  • If the site owner has not complied by the deadline, the regulator may contact the site’s payment services providers (eg credit card processors) to ask them to withdraw services from the site, thereby cutting off the site’s source of income. The regulator may also contact ‘ancillary service providers’ such as server hosts, domain name registrars, and advertisers who provide income to the site owner.
  • Payment and ancillary service providers are not obliged by law to fulfil the regulator’s requests – whether they do so is voluntary. (This is because many of these services will be provided by overseas companies, who are not under the legal authority of the UK age verification regulator.) However, credit card companies and billing providers have previously expressed their willingness to co-operate, as it is in many of their terms and conditions that material on the sites they provide billing for must be legal in their country of origin.
  • If these measures fail, the regulator may notify any UK Internet Service Provider and require them to prevent UK internet users from accessing the non-compliant website(eg by adding the site to a block list). The ISP has a duty to fulfil this requirement which is enforceable in civil proceedings.
  • Even if AV is in place, if the site contains any extreme pornographic material, the regulator may contact ISPs and require them to block the site.

With web blocking looming large as a sanction, and no information yet available about how to comply, this is a pretty worrying situation for most website owners. A lot of people are asking me what they need to do to stay within the law, and not only can I not answer those questions, no-one else can either – at least not until the regulator has been appointed and the requisite guidance has been produced.


The Act gives the regulator a fair amount of discretion in how it goes about enforcing age verification. For example, section 26 (1) of Part 3:

The age-verification regulator may, if it thinks fit, choose to exercise its powers […] principally in relation to persons who, in the age-verification regulator’s opinion—

(a) make pornographic material or extreme pornographic material available on the internet on a commercial basis to a large number of persons, or a large number of persons under the age of 18, in the United Kingdom; or

(b) generate a large amount of turnover by doing so.

How many websites will the AV regulator include in their scope? The BBFC only have a few staff members available to regulate online porn. In order to regulate each website, they first need to classify it to determine whether it “makes material available which would be classified as 18 or higher”. The BBFC need to analyse each site to determine not only its commercial status, but also how they would classify it before they know whether it falls under their jurisdiction or not. This is no small task.

Perhaps as a result of these limited resources, the chief executive of the BBFC, David Austin, has said that only tens of sites would be targeted:

“We would start with the top 50 and work our way through those, but we would not stop there. We would look to get new data every quarter, for example. As you say, sites will come in and out of popularity. We will keep up to date and focus on those most popular sites for children.”

Given their small taskforce, it would seem sensible for the BBFC to prioritise, and start with the sites which are demonstrably most visited by under 18s. But there’s nothing in the law to compel the AV regulator to take this proportionate approach. The previous online porn regulator, ATVOD, certainly didn’t; they seemed to disproportionately target femdom sites, particularly those owned by people critical of the organisation, regardless of how few under-18s were accessing those sites.

The Open Rights Group submitted a Freedom of Information request to see the correspondence between Mindgeek and the BBFC, which showed that Mindgeek have been putting pressure on BBFC via private emails to regulate all the four million sites on Sky’s adult content block list, and block any sites that are non-compliant by the deadline by default. It would be great for Mindgeek if every other adult site on the web were regulated, because their tube sites almost certainly will be, and they don’t want to be the only ones. Blocking the competition is an easy way to increase market dominance. Under the ATVOD regime there were noted examples of site owners reporting their competitor’s websites so that their competitor would get regulated and they wouldn’t, giving themselves a business advantage. If this kind of game-playing was permitted by the AV regulator, it would be an unjust and ineffective implementation of the law.

Mindgeek’s request sounds silly because it is. There’s no way they can co-opt the UK AV regulator to block the entire adult internet. Smaller sites which don’t rely on a known brand URL can easily change domain names and IP address to avoid detection, or setting up multiple mirrors. New sites start up every day, and catching them all is a Pokémon game the regulator can’t win.

With web blocking on the table, the stakes are high. I know first hand how damaging it is to have your business taken offline. Even after winning my appeal, the harm caused by a ten month downtime was not survivable. One of the conditions for appointing an AV regulator is that arrangements for appeals must be in place, and handled by a person “sufficiently independent of the age-verification regulator”. So that, too, needs to be pinned down before the regulator can be appointed; until then, we don’t know who will be handling appeals or how they will work.

I’m fear that we might end up in a situation where small business owners acting in good faith try to comply, but perhaps misunderstand the rules or don’t implement them in the right way – maybe simply don’t have the technical know-how to do it, or the money to afford someone to help them. Without guidance enforcing a proportionate approach, we risk these sites getting blocked; while other site owners who are being savvy and conniving get away with avoiding regulation, even if their sites are easier to find, and more accessed by under-18s.

There is a chance to prevent this. If the DCMS were to produce guidance that requires the regulator to take a proportionate response, and focus their attention on the most visited websites most accessed by under-18s in order to have the most impact, that would improve matters a lot. My meeting with the DCMS reassured me that they understand these concerns, but it’s now up to them to produce some sensible guidance.


ATVOD – Authority for TV on Demand, previous (and somewhat disgraced) UK online porn regulator

AV – Age verification 

Backlash – a campaign group defending freedom of expression for consenting adults 

BBFC – British Board of Film Classification, the body responsible for classifying films for legal publication (ie rating them as 12, 15, 18, etc)

DCMS – Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, a department of the UK civil service, a bureaucratic branch of government. Previously Department of Culture, Media and Sport.

DEAct – Digital Economy Act 2017

DPA – Digital Policy Alliance, a cross-party corporate and parliamentary think tank

ISP – Internet Service Provider, the company responsible for providing services that allow people to access a given website  

ORG – Open Rights Group, a digital rights campaign group 

Tags. age verification, AVMS, BBFC, censorship, DCMS, Digital Economy Act, Digital Economy Bill, Digital Policy Alliance, digital rights, Mindgeek, obscenity, Ofcom, Open Rights Group, porn, porn law

Share Button


after losing our large twitter feed we do have a new one sp please follow here

Share Button

What makes a great film

What makes a great film, well obviously we are talking spanking and related subjects, but for the purpose of this report I want to look at a new caning film. First you need to find the right cast members, the top, well Sarah Stern or Spanking Sarah will do nicely, the subjects, pick some of the prettiest around at the moment, say Jess and Tindra Frost and that gives a good basis.

Next you need a story, how about a couple of naughty senior girls who have hit upon a rather silly way to make a lot of money quite quickly. They have a bet with the rest of the girls in the school that they will be the very first girls in that school to be caned. Yes that is stupid but there we have it. The story develops and it does not take long before they are indeed told by their headmistress that they will be caned but here is where the shock sets in. The caning will not be carried out by their rather kindly old headmistress but by a sports teacher from another school who has a fearsome reputation and is well versed in the art of issuing canings.

There you have it, everything in place and the girls are duly sentenced to 48 strokes of the cane on bare bottoms, carried out in a very austere punishment room whilst they are bent over a caning stool. Now I did say I wanted to point out what makes a great film and it is of course all these things plus the two camera shooting, the editing which makes a seamless event which flows along and really does bring out the great acting from all the girls as well as the incredible sound which isolates the breathing of the girls and the swish and thwack of the cane. I especially like the excellent and sympathetic montage at the end of the film which is a bit of a trade mark of the film maker Remington Steel.

The film Is being released on Spanking Sarah’s web site and is also available on her clips site. I understand that there are in fact two versions. One is the natural edit and the other a special edit which shows each cane stroke twice, once with the view of the bottom and then immediately with the face view of each stroke. I rather like the sound of this. These two complete versions will be available to Sarah’s members to download as individual complete films or on her clips site as complete films. So, do take a look, this is the best caning film I have seen in a long while and well worth the price of membership.

Share Button

Something for nothing in the spanking world

Thanks to Best British Spanking for this post:
Well I never give up looking for something that is good, free and worth having in the spanking world, well that’s the only world I live in! At last I have found something that comes pretty close. I have reviewed Caned On Line on here previously, its a very new site featuring only caning scenes from across several sites.

It, was always quite cheap to join, well, very cheap really but now there is a way to get a free membership. If you join English Spankers or Spanking Sarah, you can if you wish claim a free membership to Caned On Line. Now I think that’s pretty amazing and the only time I have seen a genuine free offer of this type.

You can get this offer from any of the websites above or from Strand Video so I don’t know how long it will last so get along and take advantage of this very generous offer.

Share Button

Redstripe Films

So many websites with so much fantastic spanking content that to write about just one is not easy. I have however picked out one I really do like. REDSTRIPE FILMS is run by a housewife called Sandy and whilst she does not do so much filming these days she still makes sure that the site features some very different content.

Focusing mainly on the older lady and those who maybe a little “different” Sandy says that for a while the site did lose its way but she is now getting it back on track. Well I can tell you it is packed with some of the very best films around. I am particularly fond of the older lady, the mature housewife and the enthusiastic amateur spankee. She features a number of films straight from the husbands of some of the ladies and also a good selection of those with ladies who maybe only made just the one film

There are also a good number of sex and spanking films, I know that some people don’t like to mix the two, indeed unless it is an intrinsic part of the story I tend to feel a bit that way as well. I am pleased to say though that she seems to get the mix just right.

There is also a section inside the site called the Spanking Mansion. Now this I really do love, it features the more way out and inclusive side of the CP scene. With some excellent stories from Nicky Montford, Aleesha Fox and my favourite Suzanne Smart. This is one amazing lady and I would love to see a site dedicated just to her. If you have not seen any of her films then it is well worth the cost of joining just to see her in some incredible spanking action. She is typical of the sort of lady featured on this site but she goes the extra mile. Writing most of her own scripts she experiences all the nasty painful things she wants to.

Sandy manages to find those ladies who really are naughty and cheeky and I would say that the update this week features one such. Rachael is really bratty and whilst she has featured in a few films she has not been over exposed. Sandy has three of her films lined up, starting this week with her playing a naughty schoolgirl, well very naughty as you will see. She ends up with a hard spanking and I think it was well deserved. I think that just for the natural naughtiness of Rachael and the excellent spanking action you should take a look.

So, an excellent site packed with full length films and pictures at a very affordable price. Get along and take a look.


Share Button

Caned On Line

It’s always good to see a new website these days with so many having to go out of business. This one however is quite different from the usual, it is VERY niche! Yes as you will have gathered from the name it features caning films and pictures only.

Now I have it on good authority from those who make films that the ones that are the most watched are the caning films, these are the ones that are most asked for by the members of sites. So, what does this site have. For a start in the free area it has a bright, attractive, clear and easy to follow design, with pictures to represent the films and a short description to follow each. These days in common with most sites you will not find free clips on the outside of the site, this is just to keep them away from those who should not be looking, but I can tell you the quality of the films is excellent and everything you would expect. Inside the members area there are a number of different sections for films, pictures and one for bonus content. This I understand will cover films from amateurs, pictures that don’t quite fit the spec of the site and most important some extra long bonus films. These will be compilations and can run for in excess of 60 mins. I hope you have a good broadband speed as these are in very high quality.

The films are sourced from across the range of the Strand group of sites and also some that do not appear on any sites at all so a real mixed bag. The subject matter ranges from domestic punishment to secretaries, uniforms including nurses and school and some good double caning sequences. I have to say though I am very keen on the longer films, it’s great to be able to download one that has maybe six sequences on it with just the caning scenes. The cost of all this? Well more than reasonable at only around £8.00 per month.

So there, please hop along and take a look see, it’s called

Share Button


Please read the many earlier articles so that you know just what your MP is doing in YOUR name. Dis he or she ask you? Ask them, tell them you do not want this bill.

                                                                                    Almost 25,000 people have signed our petition calling on Parliament to reject censorship of legal content.

In the Digital Economy Bill, the BBFC  would be able to block adult websites that don’t verify the age of their users. No privacy safeguards are in the Bill. UK citizens risk having their sexuality and sexual interests leaked, hacked or exploited.
                                                                                                       What makes this worse is that the proposals are unlikely to work or keep children safe online.

The House of Lords is looking at the Bill at the moment and will vote on it in the next couple of weeks. The UK is a small market for adult websites. Most foreign websites won’t enforce age verification.  So the BBFC will have a power to block potentially millions of non-compliant websites.

The Government says the BBFC will only use this power to block a small number of websites – perhaps 100 of the largest sites. But blocking 100 adult sites won’t prevent under 18s from accessing adult content. There will be plenty of other sites for them to access.
                                                                                                          Help us get the message out that the UK’s children need education, not censorship, to keep them safe online.
Can you sign our petition against the censorship of legal content? Once you’ve signed it, could you share the petition with your friends too?

                                                                                                                                                           Sign the petition


Thanks to the open rights group. Please support them they are working for you

Share Button

Inside the government’s mad plan to catalogue every video on the Internet

This is taken from an article written for  The New Statesman by leading lawyer Myles Jackman

The plan is unworkable and troublingly authoritarian, says Myles Jackman

Imagine a government scheme to catalogue and classify every single video on the web.

But you don’t need to imagine: that’s the bizarre proposal being put forward by Theresa May’s government in the Digital Economy Bill, which reached committee stage in the Lords this week.

The Digital Economy Bill proposes that online video should be classified just as films are now, and by the same people – the British Board of Film Classification.

According to the BBFC’s annual report for 2015, the board classified 983 films for distribution in the UK, and 1,143 hours of online content for video-on-demand.

To put this in context, hundreds hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute. The demand that the BBFC should be able to make a judgment on the vast amount of video uploaded to a vast range of sites across the world is extremely ambitious.

As David Austin of the BBFC tactfully put it in a letter to Joanna Shields, the minister for Internet Safety and Security, “the internet is constantly evolving and inevitably any initiative in this area needs to be multi-faceted and flexible.” Well quite.

How could this possibly work? Classification can’t simply be left to an algorithm, so we’re left with the prospect of a huge recruitment drive for people to sit around all day and decide what is and isn’t acceptable, as suggested by Open Rights Group New Government Jobs spoof adverts.

But let’s give the government the benefit of the doubt and suppose that this plan has been fully, scalably costed, and thousands of people across the country will be paid to watch and classify millions of hours of video and decide who’s allowed to watch it.

The next step is placing age verification on sites.

The bill states “A person must not make pornographic material available on the internet on a  commercial basis to persons in the United Kingdom except in a way that  secures that, at any given time, the material is not normally accessible by  persons under the age of 18.”

“Commercial basis” here includes free-to-access sites, and “pornographic material” is a phrase that covers a multitude of sins, from R18 content (of the type not to be supplied “other than in a licensed sex shop”) to video of which it is “reasonable to assume from its nature that it was produced solely or principally for the purposes of sexual arousal.”

There is no indication of how age verification will work. A basic option would be through credit cards but this would expose Internet users to greater risk of credit card fraud – nor would it take much for a young person to ‘borrow’ an adult’s card for the purpose of identification. Other proposals could mean that porn sites are creating databases of what sites are viewed by whom – essentially surveillance, with the potential added risk of accidental public disclosure.

Given the trail of leaks of personal data in the last few years, such as the Ashley Madison hack, is anyone comfortable with the idea of a record of every risque but legal site they have visited?

Given these hacks, you would think that the Bill would at least require that Internet users privacy is protected but there are no obligations to do this.

How can the British government impose age verification on the porn industry, especially as the majority of porn sites are based outside the UK? This was not adequately thought about in the first draft of the Bill but since an amendment has been added to give the BBFC the power to tell Internet Service providers to block sites that don’t comply.

So the BBFC could be in charge of a censorship regime overseeing the blocking of thousands of websites, whose content is perfectly legal, without a court order. Once this is in place to censor porn sites, how else could it be used?

New Statesman

If you are concerned about you loss of freedom keep informed, take a look here 

Share Button

Blog roundup

It has been a tough start to the year.  I really am not made for the Winter and I am in desperate need of some Sun.  Unfortunately, circumstances will not allow me to go back over to Spain until March and it seems such a long time away.   Despite ill health I have been busy shooting more content for our great sites and have some fantastic girls and guys lined up for your viewing pleasure for the next few months.  Some brand spanking new faces and some of your favourites have made a return.   I am particularly proud of our latest series on Spanking Sarah.  St Justs is a school with a difference.  I am educating the parents one spank at a time to try and ensure that their children behave.  If you haven’t already, go take a look.    If you don’t like to buy a site membership then please remember that all our films and some special compilations are available at Clips4Sale or Spanking Library.

We shot with a new model called Ambrosia on Saturday.  Ambrosia had never been spanked before but was keen to give it a try.  We loved filming with her and you will see a lot more of this lovely lady on our sites over the next few months.  She makes her debut at English Spankers this week.  Mr. Stern is a well-known disciplinarian and as well as punishing naughty housewives at the request of husbands it is not unknown for ladies to come to see Mr. Stern to take their very first steps into the spanking world. This is what happened in this story, Ambrosia had come to see Mr. Stern, she wanted to experience her first spanking but she did not know that Kodders was pretending to be Mr. Stern. He told her some story and soon she was over his knee getting her very first taste of a spanking from this impersonator. She did get spanked hard but justice would certainly come.

Share Button

New Government Jobs

More on the campaign to stop the government implementing the digital economy bill, that iniquitous piece of legislation designed to close down the porn industry and to stop you as adults looking at perfectly legal content on the internet. As usual in cases in cases like this their chosen agents are the backward thinking BBFC and so thanks to the Open Rights Group for the information below.

We have launched a spoof recruitment campaign to highlight absurd proposals in the Digital Economy Bill, which will give the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) the power to classify and censor websites, just like they do for films.

The BBFC will decide if porn sites are checking and monitoring the age of their users. If they’re not, the BBFC can tell ISPs to block sites – even though their content is legal. The only problem is that the Internet is massive so the BBFC can’t be expected to do it all by themselves. So we’re running spoof adverts for Internet Censors, who can help the BBFC classify all of the adult content on the web.

The campaign launch coincides with the start of the committee stage for the Digital Economy in the House of Lords this week. Please share the campaign and sign our petition.

Please help us by linking to this news site, if possible place our button on your own web site, if you place it we will always link back to you. If you care about your freedom please help. Remember, they will start by banning porn but then what come next?

Share Button

Blog Roundup

We previously posted some caning updates and some great pictures but did neglect to feature any men being caned, well so as not to be accused of discrimination we would like to make redress and publish this from Kodders blog  It’s pretty strong stuff but I understand that Sarah has no problem finding men who want to be dealt with in this way and, well why not? She has a fascinating site here and it’s packed with very good, well thought out sequences and with some lucky guys who obviously adore her. Thanks must go to Kodders who runs a good, informative blog and keeps it well updated. Please send me details of your blog and I will review it here.


Welcome back James to Sarah Spanks Men. Well it’s been a while, over a year in fact since James was last at the site and what better way to welcome him back in Sarah Stern style especially after Sarah checked and realised James has never received a cold caning on camera, which has given Sarah the perfect opportunity to deliver a severe cold caning on the bare bottom which will be a first for James. Next to chocolate this is one of Sarah’s most favourite things ever.

Sarah has chosen a cane which is fast becoming one on her more favoured heavier thuddy implements. it’s a Reformatory Kooboo Rattan 83cms in length and 12 mm in width with a straight handle. It’s a wonderful choice for this first time cold caning as demonstrated beautifully by Sarah as she begins to deliver the hardest strokes to James’s naked bottom. He really is feeling these strokes.

After ten strokes or so James’s bottom is turning a lovely shade of red. Sarah delivers the next three strokes in succession which makes James catch his breath, Sarah has a little chuckle to herself.

Sarah describes how wonderful caning is and how much enjoyment she gets from delivering a caning because we the subbies enjoy it so much too. I (Kodders) am in total agreement. I adore the cane and I adore the challenge of a cold caning and being caned by Sarah is one of the most amazing, challenging, fulfilling experiences. If you haven’t tried it, but you’ve thought about it, you must do it as soon as possible so you too can feel this utter satisfaction of total submission for everybody’s pleasure.

Went off on a slight tangent there, let’s get back to this wonderful scene.  Sarah continues her wonderful cane strokes towards the end of the scene there are more flurries of three, four and five strokes in very quick succession.

For the record as Sarah was curious as to how many strokes, not counting the lesser cane taps about half way through the films, Sarah delivered a total of 80 of the hardest and most wonderful cane strokes during this awesome cold caning scene. Hats off to both James and Sarah, a wonderful cold caning, and thank you both for a truly remarkable and enjoyable punishment film, and Sarah, you look absolutely amazing in your beautiful black lingerie, no wonder you have such a long line of willing male bottoms waiting to go over your spanking bench.


Share Button

Blog roundup 2

I do love to see a good hard caning film, it has to have a good story as well but the important thing is that both parties are well into what they are doing. There are many types of canes and they are all different, the real aficionado will know all about dragons and such like but for me I just like to see it used to effect and to see the response of the recipients. I have taken a couple of good examples here from English Spankers.

The first features a girl I really do like who takes a real punishment JESS


Jess is from the Sexy Cleaning Company but so far she has not done much cleaning and she has not been very sexy. After a chat with her our good housewife decides that she still wants to get her monies worth from this young lady. She is well into spanking and the cleaning company girls are supposed to like being spanked but will she like the selection of canes. Well she bends over and gets her bare bottom caned, see what you think, did she enjoy it.

There is always something a bit special about watching the first caning sessions for a new girl. The one I want to show you is from Lilly, a rather mature lady who has made her only films for English Spankers, Take a look at the pictures and see what you think.


Lilly is a mature lady making her first spanking videos for us. In this film she is about to get her very first caning. She is supposed to be a sexy kissagram girl but she gets to the job she should be doing to reveal her bottom covered in bright red spank marks. She had previously been sent by her husband to see Mr Stern for discipline and had neglected to tell the agency that she was well marked. Only one thing to do, more discipline but this time it is a severe caning as she is bent over. Hard and boy this time she does have some marks.

Share Button

Blog Roundup

OK so no more nasty news at the moment we therefore have the time to report on the latest blog updates. It does seem to me that there are fewer blogs around and we have asked blog owners to email us and we will feature their blogs, but so far not a very good response, we had hoped for better but there you go.

Lets take a look at The Chiefs Spanking Blog, he always has some interesting things happening, not too sure about those pained faces though. I did like this update but there again I love anything with the amazing Amelia Jane Rutherford in it.

Cheerleader Spankings – The Dramatic Brat
Starring Amelia Jane Rutherford & Joelle Barros

Assistant coach, Joelle Barros, calls in new girl, Amelia for a private meeting during practice. Joelle has a few issues with the new British girl’s terrible attitude. Amelia has been wearing her game uniform instead of the plain practice one everyone else uses. It unsettles the other girls as she knows this causes friction in the squad. Joelle also knows she is dealing with such an annoying brat so insists that she take a good old fashioned spanking. Amelia complains and grumbles rather too loudly so she is further humiliated with her cheer panties pulled down getting spanked over coach’s lap. Earlier, Amelia had been brushing her hair whilst talking to Joelle, something which the coach had noticed and it had irritated her so decides to take the punishment s a stage further. She pushes this annoying dramatic brat further over her lap so Amelia is uncomfortably face down, ass up… getting her bare bottom whacked harder! Joelle only finishes the punishment when she is ready and ignores the continual whining from the new, embarrassed British cheerleader. This ordeal only ends when Amelia accepts her poor attitude and behaviour is wrong and that she will be a more valued member of the squad! 

Share Button

Some facts about banning porn

What do you think of our politicians.

UK’s EX Prime Minister David Cameron said he was going to block all online pornography, have a look at him on the BBC News   This means that every household in Britain connected to the internet will be obliged to declare whether they want to maintain access to online pornography.

Digging deeper into the subject you find out three things: firstly, how much of the UK’s web traffic is affected by the ‘corroding influence’ of pornography; secondly, see how the UK compares to other countries when it comes to adult content; and finally, understand what’s the demand for online pornography in the UK.

Porn Traffic is Bigger than all Social Networks Combined

An analysis was done of the UK’s web traffic in June 2013 and looked at by category, finding that an astonishing 8.50% of the UK’s web traffic in June 2013 took place in adult sites. To put this in context, traffic across all social networks combined accounted for 7.30% of the UK’s web traffic in June and Shopping for 6.06%.

So porn is big on the web

Only two categories surpass porn in terms of traffic volume – Search Engines and Arts & Entertainment (thanks to YouTube) which accounted for 15.65% and 9.59% of the UK’s web traffic in June.

UK porn consumption above worldwide average, but Germans take the crown

The Worldwide average share of adult traffic is 7.65%, nearly a point below UK (8.50%). Interestingly, Ireland also consumes less adult content than the UK and it’s slightly below the global average with 7.45% share of adult traffic. Stereotypes are bad but Germans take the crown when it comes to porn consumption – 12.47% of their traffic takes place on adult sites

 Searching For Porn

The fact is that most of the time people don’t just stumble upon adult content. When analysing Google UK’s outgoing traffic over the past 3 months, we see that 8.19% of searches led to Adult websites. What’s more,  the Top 20 sites receiving traffic from Google UK (list below) and 5 out this Top 20 sites are adult. is the biggest winner of Google traffic and even made it to the Top 10. Over 1% of Google UK’s outgoing traffic ended up in Pornhub – that is a lot of traffic! AND IT’s A PIRATE SITE given prominence by Google.

Food For Thought

Porn is a big part of the internet. Not just in the UK but around the globe. Filtering porn sites is not an easy job yet it ultimately comes down to what people search for and what they want to see. The quick and easy access to pornography is indeed a phenomenon that the internet accelerated, but we live in a multi-device society and when there’s a will there’s a way. When people started setting up Wi-Fi networks in their homes, neighbors often “borrowed” their internet connection – soon, the favorite neighbor on the block might be the one that ‘opts in’.

Thanks to @MrBuchuk on Twitter Get good news from him.


Share Button

Sign the petition


If you value your freedom of expression and the freedom of the internet then you should seriously look at what the British government has planed for you. They are going to stop you looking at your favourite adult web sites unless you pass to them some of your most sensitive details and information and we know just how much we can trust the government to keep a secret. Please take the time to sign this petition and get all your friends to sign it as well.

So far it has a pitiful amount of signatures, is this really a measure of how concerned the kink community and the vanilla community is about the total loss of freedom. Your freedom of choice must be worth the small effort it takes to sign and to pass on this information via Facebook and twitter.

The Digital Economy Bill has passed its third reading in the Commons. It includes measures to force Internet Service Providers to block pornographic websites which don’t verify the age of users via intrusive means, and to censor legal content depicting sexual acts classified “non-conventional”.


This amounts to intrusive and dangerous State censorship of legal content online.

While the Government may claim that the aim is solely to protect children from viewing adult content, the reality is that these measures are unnecessary – when ISPs already provide optional filters for such content, bring severe privacy risks, and establish the precedent and framework to allow the Government to censor legal online content of which it simply does not approve.

These measures must be rejected so please follow this link and sign now.


Share Button